Taxpayer Bill of Rights [TABOR], A Look at Colorado’s Experience

Wisconsin’s legislature continues to consider a Taxpayer Bill of Rights. Colorado passed a taxpayer bill of rights in 1992. Steven Walters visits the front range to talk with locals about their version of TABOR. Why did TABOR happen in Colorado? The numbers tell the story:

  • The problem: From 1983 to ’92, spending by Colorado state government rose by 97%, while inflation rose 29.7% and the state’s population increased by 10.4%. We have a similar problem, unfortunately, Wisconsin’s economy is not the powerhouse it once was.
  • The solution: In 1992, Colorado voters – by a 54% to 46% margin – passed a Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights that limited state spending and required excess tax funds to be refunded the next year, unless voters let governments keep the surplus.

Much more here:
alltheweb | Clusty | Google | MSN Search | Teoma | Yahoo Search

Hawaii: Maui’s Haleakala Sunrise Photos & Video

Click on the photos to view larger versions of the images. Visiting the “house of the sun” is quite an experience. Maui’s Haleakala crater sites at 10,000 feet. It’s quite a drive up from the beach – at 4:00a.m.
Mark Twain described Maui’s Haleakala Sunrise as follows:

It was the sublimest spectacle I ever witnessed, and I think the memory of it will remain with me always.

Enjoy the complete sunrise via this Maui Haleakala Crater Sunrise Movie with music. Webcam.
Background links: alltheweb | Clusty | Google | MSN Search | Teoma | Yahoo Search

How long will our ascendancy last? Jared Diamond on US Power

Very useful reading:
Jared Diamond, who won the 1998 Pulitzer Prize in general nonfiction for “Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies,” is the author of the forthcoming “Collapse: How Societies Choose or Fail to Succeed.” His article, The Ends of the World as We Know Them was published January 1, 2005:

History also teaches us two deeper lessons about what separates successful societies from those heading toward failure. A society contains a built-in blueprint for failure if the elite insulates itself from the consequences of its actions. That’s why Maya kings, Norse Greenlanders and Easter Island chiefs made choices that eventually undermined their societies. They themselves did not begin to feel deprived until they had irreversibly destroyed their landscape.
Could this happen in the United States? It’s a thought that often occurs to me here in Los Angeles, when I drive by gated communities, guarded by private security patrols, and filled with people who drink bottled water, depend on private pensions, and send their children to private schools. By doing these things, they lose the motivation to support the police force, the municipal water supply, Social Security and public schools. If conditions deteriorate too much for poorer people, gates will not keep the rioters out. Rioters eventually burned the palaces of Maya kings and tore down the statues of Easter Island chiefs; they have also already threatened wealthy districts in Los Angeles twice in recent decades.

Iowa’s state government funds a local Venture Capital Deal

Sort of a deja vu vis a vis SWIB’s initiatives:

The money for the Acuity Ventures agreement will come from the Grow Iowa Values Fund, the economic development program that’s limping along with about $16 million of $100 million still available.
Lawmakers are expected to consider early next year finding a permanent source for the $503 million premier economic development program.

I generally think the state should just get out of the way and focus on reducing costs and paperwork. In other words, spend time on things that make it easier to create business and hire people in Wisconsin.

…”The Vigor of Antibodies”

How to Change the World: Social Entrepeneurs and the Power of New Ideas, by David Bornstein revolves around Bill Drayton:

James O’Toole, an expert in management and leadership, observes that great thinkers throughout the world agree that “groups resist change with all the vigor of antibodies attacking an intruding virus.” O’Toole examines a number of cases in which a potentially beneficial institutional change was resisted and finds that the resistance occurs when a group perceives that a change in question will challenge its “power, prestige, and satisfaction with who they are, what they believe, and what they cherish.” He asserts: “The major factor in our resistance to change is the desire not to have the will of others forced on us.”

Interesting and useful, via Jon Udell.