Every three weeks, a FedEx flight departs Zaventem Airport on the edge of Brussels carrying Michel Boey’s products to the United States. Call it the chocolate bomber.
“It is exactly as in wine,” he said, receiving a visitor amid heavy aromas of dark chocolate. “Once, wine was wine. Now we appreciate smaller quantities, but the quality is better.”
Did an iPod Scuttle the (Broadcast) Flag?
Wes Phillips takes an interesting look at the Senate Commerce Committee’s recent sausage making discussion regarding the “Broadcast Flags” – or “Audio Flag’s. These are essentially “takings” of our fair use rights via Hollywood special interests:
John Sununu (R-NH), an MIT graduate, questioned the necessity of the restriction. He said that advocates of the restriction maintained that its absence would “stifle creativity.” He demurred. “We have now an unprecedented wave of creativity and product and content development…new business models, and new methodologies for distributing this content. The history of government mandates is that it always restricts innovation…why would we think that this one special time, we’re going to impose a statutory government mandate on technology, and it will actually encourage innovation?”
Best and Worst Selling Cars By Company
The winners, the laggards, and the just-plain-so-expensive-that-almost-no-one-buys-them cars.
Rosanne Cash Black Cadillac Gives Grief a Lift
his past week, Cash released what is perhaps her most personal album to date — and what might just be her finest: “Black Cadillac.” It’s a musical memoir of mortality, loss and redemption.
Cash explains that the album served as a catharsis.
“The writing of it was a release in a way,” she says. “And so to bring my reason and discipline and my sense of poetry to this — these feelings that something manageable, this tremendous sense of grief and loss, to bring all of those things to this, to this kind of tidal wave of feelings was useful to me.”
Koppel on the Decline of TV News
Now, television news should not become a sort of intellectual broccoli to be jammed down our viewers’ unwilling throats. We are obliged to make our offerings as palatable as possible. But there are too many important things happening in the world today to allow the diet to be determined to such a degree by the popular tastes of a relatively narrow and apparently uninterested demographic.
What is, ultimately, most confusing about the behavior of the big three networks is why they ever allowed themselves to be drawn onto a battlefield that so favors their cable competitors. At almost any time, the audience of a single network news program on just one broadcast network is greater than the combined audiences of CNN, Fox and MSNBC.
Paying Taxes: Sport or Folly?
Forgive me here if I take a position against taxes, but as you may know, it’s a bit of a favorite American pastime. It’s OK for everyone else to pay taxes, just don’t raise mine, and just don’t ask me to pay any more than my fair share. By the way, if I can figure out a way to avoid paying some of those taxes, don’t begrudge my deduction.
It’s admittedly a tough position to take knowing that lower tax dollars may mean that our men and women in green may not have enough armor, that the shuttle is built by the lowest bidder, our school teachers aren’t paid sufficiently, and on and on, all the way down to the pothole across the street that is now big enough to swallow my left front end if I don’t swerve in time to avoid it.
But I better stop before I talk myself out of complaining about taxes. Who hasn’t heard of the $400 hammer, after all?
This article about the IRS prosecuting lawyers who come up with tax shelters did more than strike me. It’s just plain wrong. Think about it. Congress passes laws that require us to pay taxes. Once you establish the rules and write them down, it’s up to the lawyers to figure out the loopholes and the way around them. The tax code fills up 24 megabytes of space on my hard drive, which on my iPod leaves only enough room for Stairway to Heaven and The Long and Winding Road. There really isn’t much difference between the songs and the code anyway, but I digress.
So, when enterprising lawyers go out there and successfully figure out how to shelter money from taxes, the IRS takes aim and prosecutes the lawyers for being smart enough to figure out what they did wrong when they wrote the code. I’m not sure if the lawyers are being prosecuted because they showed the ________ (fill in your own word) of the IRS and Congress to the rest of us or because the result of their work actually means less dollars in the government’s hands and more money in our hands.
Sure, there’s another way to look at it: the lawyers actually did something illegal that was precluded by the code, and they should be punished. As you can see just from these paragraphs, however, there’s no such thing as black and white in the Internal Revenue Service code. To prove that, all you have to do is look up section 61 that defines income and see what a mess the whole thing starts with.
If the IRS wants to collect money from us, how about making it simple? You know, just like it was when we were kids and dividing up the spoils from the lemonade stand: “One for you and two for me, one for you and two for me…”
A Homecoming for Bart Starr
For the man who will stride to midfield for the coin toss before the Super Bowl next weekend, it will be something of a homecoming.
Bart Starr, one of football’s greatest quarterbacks and the most important player of the Green Bay Packers dynasty in the 1960s, stepped away from the game and the public eye in 1988 after a family tragedy. Kickoff of Super Bowl XL will see his public reunion with the National Football League. And after the game he’ll be presenting the Lombardi Trophy, named after his old coach, the man with whom he won five NFL championships and two Super Bowls.
Glosoli in HD
Sigur Ros; Glosoli from Takk in HD (gorgeous photography).
IBM on the Future of Television
Our analysis indicates that market evolution hinges on two key market drivers: openness of access channels and levels of consumer involvement with media. For the next 5-7 years, there will be change on both fronts — but not uniformly. The industry instead will be stamped by consumer bimodality, a coexistence of two types of users with disparate channel requirements. While one consumer segment remains passive in the living room, the other will force radical change in business models in a search for anytime, anywhere content through multiple channels.
Via Terry Heaton.
Interesting that IBM is chatting about this game. Large changes are underway….
Reshaping Broadcast TV Revenue
JPMorgan Chase analyst Spencer Wang says the earliest signs of this fundamental value shift is the sharp contrast between the languishing stock price of traditional media companies (representing an estimated loss of $31 billion in collective market capitalization) and the meteoric rise of so-called new-media stocks (reflecting an aggregate $69 billion gain in market cap).
More directly, evolving new business models are gradually redefining the value of content in the digital age: what distributors and consumers are willing to pay, what it costs to produce and how much revenue and profit is generated as compared to traditional ways of doing business.