Thinking different about opening arteries


Gina Kolata writes about some different thinking with respect to opening arteries (using stents & bypass surgery) vis a vis heart attack risks:

But the new model of heart disease shows that the vast majority of heart attacks do not originate with obstructions that narrow arteries.
Instead, recent and continuing studies show that a more powerful way to prevent heart attacks in patients at high risk is to adhere rigorously to what can seem like boring old advice ? giving up smoking, for example, and taking drugs to get blood pressure under control, drive cholesterol levels down and prevent blood clotting.
Researchers estimate that just one of those tactics, lowering cholesterol to what guidelines suggest, can reduce the risk of heart attack by a third but is followed by only 20 percent of heart patients.

Biotech, Wisconsin’s Economic Savior? – an update


Judy Newman has a timely article on the state of Madison’s biotech industry:

The biotech hub took a big hit last week with the news that PowderJect Vaccines in Middleton will close, wiping out the jobs of 88 employees, many of them highly educated, specialized scientists and technologists. And it’s not the only local biotech that has pared its staff or even disappeared in recent years. <

There are several issues here:

  • The biggest issue: Risk taking, attitude (compare to California, Colorado, Oregon & Washington)
  • Money (California’s biotech money is a completely different world)
  • Again, we need more people that are willing to take a risk (and fail in some cases)
  • I doubt that additional state backed funding schemes will make any difference at all…

Health Care Cost Saving Idea

Clayton Christensen, a Harvard professor who studies disruptive innovations recently discussed an idea to reduce health care costs for many typical patient requests:

“Christensen nailed it on the head when he said this is an industry in desperate need of disruption. In its current state, a gross amount of overhead costs prepare hospitals and doctors to treat the most complex illnesses known to mankind.
In reality, most people need a quick look and a prescription. Christensen talked about a new business model coming out of Minnesota as the perfect disruptor for medicine.
Because Minnesota allows nurses to write prescriptions, the idea would be to create medical drop-in sites that treat 14 primary illnesses. Everything from strep throat to “burn your warts off.”
The flat rate for a checkup and ‘scrip is $29. If it takes more than 15 minutes, it’s free.
This is what you and I want, right? No long wait on the phone. No huge bills for a simple checkup. Quick and easy, in and out.
This would provide an alternate product to consumers and make going to a big ol’ HMO with a sore throat an unacceptable hassle for most consumers.
Christensen is suggesting this model to the Johns Hopkins hospitals in Maryland as a way for them to build their brand, embrace a disruptive force to come and give their patients what they want.
The Baltimore medical giant is reticent, he says, which is a typical response from an existing business reluctant to embrace disruption. “

Still Seperate & Unequal


Bruce Murphy writes that low income students struggle to fund a college education:

“Fifty years after the Supreme Court ruled that black Americans must receive an equal chance at a quality education, a college degree has become the ticket to the middle class. But it is a ticket that poor families – a high percentage of them minorities – often can’t afford.
…Holmes works eight hours a week on campus and another 21 hours a week off campus at a local bank. She’s had to scale back her class load to keep up. She also could take out more loans in order to cut back on work, but that would saddle her with as much as $20,000 in debt by graduation, with years of medical school education yet to finance.”

TV News (contradiction in terms)?

Dan Shafer comments on the general substance free nature of TV News

Yep. “Real” news on TV died an agonizing death years ago when networks decided that next-day interviews with stars of network shows were news when they clearly weren’t. I read two newspapers and several newsy Web sites a day and never watch TV news any more. I’m a tiny minority, but it works for me.
Being an informed participant in the democratic process should be worth spending some time and brain cycles, not just sitting dumb and dumfounded in front of a boob toob passively absorbing the crap the networks hand out.

From Doc Searls….