{"id":3561,"date":"2009-09-09T08:15:27","date_gmt":"2009-09-09T08:15:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zmetro.com\/?p=3561"},"modified":"2009-09-09T08:15:27","modified_gmt":"2009-09-09T08:15:27","slug":"wsj_down_nyt_up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/?p=3561","title":{"rendered":"WSJ DOWN, NYT UP, FT WINS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.tapsns.com\/blog\/index.php\/2009\/09\/wsj-down-nyt-up-ft-wins\/\">Mark<\/a>: <\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i>Which brings up an interesting, and not trivial question: why is the U.S. , home of no anti-trust enforcement during the last eight years, home of raw capitalism, supposed home of competition, about to be without a single decent source of unbiased news?   And why is Britain, socialist leader among English-speaking peoples, suddenly the Keeper of the Realm when it comes to objective news reporting?  Who wouldn\u2019t take the BBC over the U.S.\u2019 National Public Radio?  Who wouldn\u2019t take the Financial Times over the WSJ?  Or the Guardian over the NYT?<br \/>\n<br \/><Br><br \/>\nThe British have not lost the ability to be \u201cfair and balanced,\u201d the self-mocking theme of Fox TV, although Rupert has certainly taken out a lot of the competition.<br \/>\n<br \/><Br><br \/>\nWhy is it, for instance, that the best programs on U.S. politics, the Kennedy assassination, global warming, and even Israel \u2013 South African nuclear cooperation, have all come  out of Britain?  Why can they tell our news stories better than we can?  Mostly, I think, they are just neutral.  There is something strong in the British psyche that still believes in telling the truth, that still sees the news as news, and not as advertising conveyor belt.  The U.S. has totally lost this view, with the exceptions noted above, and in some small papers, although many of those have gone their own sad, ad-driven route.<br \/>\n<br \/><Br><br \/>\nIndeed, in a time when owners are pointing to a lack of ads to support their product, I think they are missing the whole point: they are losing subscribers, and the ads are following.<br \/>\n<br \/><Br><br \/>\nToday, I read the FT religiously, the NYT increasingly, and the WSJ almost not at all.  I\u2019m not alone; several friends have recently canceled their WSJ subscriptions, so fed up are they with Murdoch\u2019s machinations.  I don\u2019t see how the WSJ can survive, being a Murdoch bauble, even if he sees it as the crown jewel.  What he thinks doeesn\u2019t matter, or worse, matteres and is morally wrong, as advertisers on Fox have proven lately by dropping the Beck show like a stone.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\">Financial Times<\/a> is an excellent read (their iPhone app is better than either the Wall Street Journal&#8217;s or the NY Times).   I think the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\">Wall Street Journal<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\">New York Times<\/a> have interesting articles from time to time.   Kudos to the Financial Times for sticking to their knitting, as it were.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.tapsns.com\/blog\/index.php\/2009\/09\/wsj-down-nyt-up-ft-wins\/\">Mark<\/a>: <\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i>Which brings up an interesting, and not trivial question: why is the U.S. , home of no anti-trust enforcement during the last eight years, home of raw capitalism, supposed home of competition, about to be without a single decent source of unbiased news?   And why is Britain, socialist leader among English-speaking peoples, suddenly the Keeper of the Realm when it comes to objective news reporting?  Who wouldn\u2019t take the BBC over the U.S.\u2019 National Public Radio?  Who wouldn\u2019t take the Financial Times over the WSJ?  Or the Guardian over the NYT?<br \/>\n<br \/><Br><br \/>\nThe British have not lost the ability to be \u201cfair and balanced,\u201d the self-mocking theme of Fox TV, although Rupert has certainly taken out a lot of the competition.<br \/>\n<br \/><Br><br \/>\nWhy is it, for instance, that the best programs on U.S. politics, the Kennedy assassination, global warming, and even Israel \u2013 South African nuclear cooperation, have all come  out of Britain?  Why can they tell our news stories better than we can?  Mostly, I think, they are just neutral.  There is something strong in the British psyche that still believes in telling the truth, that still sees the news as news, and not as advertising conveyor belt.  The U.S. has totally lost this view, with the exceptions noted above, and in some small papers, although many of those have gone their own sad, ad-driven route.<br \/>\n<br \/><Br><br \/>\nIndeed, in a time when owners are pointing to a lack of ads to support their product, I think they are missing the whole point: they are losing subscribers, and the ads are following.<br \/>\n<br \/><Br><br \/>\nToday, I read the FT religiously, the NYT increasingly, and the WSJ almost not at all.  I\u2019m not alone; several friends have recently canceled their WSJ subscriptions, so fed up are they with Murdoch\u2019s machinations.  I don\u2019t see how the WSJ can survive, being a Murdoch bauble, even if he sees it as the crown jewel.  What he thinks doeesn\u2019t matter, or worse, matteres and is morally wrong, as advertisers on Fox have proven lately by dropping the Beck show like a stone.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\">Financial Times<\/a> is an excellent read (their iPhone app is better than either the Wall Street Journal&#8217;s or the NY Times).   I think the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\">Wall Street Journal<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\">New York Times<\/a> have interesting articles from time to time.   Kudos to the Financial Times for sticking to their knitting, as it were.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37,21,23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3561"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3561"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3561\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}