{"id":523,"date":"2004-09-09T00:26:43","date_gmt":"2004-09-09T00:26:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zmetro.com\/?p=523"},"modified":"2004-09-09T00:26:43","modified_gmt":"2004-09-09T00:26:43","slug":"agricultural_fi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/?p=523","title":{"rendered":"Agricultural Finance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Years (decades!) ago, I worked briefly for a bank.   I recall that ag lending was, at the time, at best a poor stepchild to commercial lending.  This Economist article provides a fascinating look at Rabobank&#8217;s (Dutch Bank) acquisition of Farm Credit Services &#8211; a US Government sponsored lending entity.   Perhaps some Wisconsin Financiers should think about this&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i>AGAINST THE GRAIN<br \/>\nAug 26th 2004<br \/>\nWhy is a Dutch bank moving into agricultural finance in America?<br \/>\nWHAT on earth is Rabobank up to? This Dutch co-operative bank has been<br \/>\nbusily expanding its franchise in farm-finance, an area American banks<br \/>\nhave done everything to avoid since a meltdown in the 1980s. If that<br \/>\nwas not odd enough, Rabobank&#8217;s most recent move is truly unique. At the<br \/>\nend of July, it reached an agreement to buy Farm Credit Services of<br \/>\nAmerica, an institution that is a component of America&#8217;s odd network of<br \/>\ngovernment-sponsored entities (GSEs). That agreement has unleashed an<br \/>\nunholy row.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nThese financial institutions, including the well-known housing-finance<br \/>\ngiants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, enjoy the implicit backing of the US<br \/>\nTreasury, and thus low funding costs, as well as tax breaks. All of<br \/>\nthese advantages would be lost if Rabobank&#8217;s purchase goes through.<br \/>\nBut no GSE has ever before agreed to a buyout. And soon after<br \/>\nRabobank&#8217;s offer, a backlash began. A sister institution in Minnesota<br \/>\nmade a counter-offer backed by a lobbying group representing other<br \/>\ngovernment-backed farm lenders. Two American Senators have called for<br \/>\nCongressional hearings. Concerns have been voiced about whether the<br \/>\nsale of Farm Credit Services could weaken the overall farm-credit<br \/>\nsystem: might a foreign buyer be less sensitive to local conditions?<br \/>\nThe biggest question is, however, unlikely to be raised: whether the<br \/>\noffer for Farm Credit Services means that, finally, it is time to scrap<br \/>\nthe GSE system entirely. &#8220;The reason the farm-credit system came into<br \/>\nexistence is that no one else would provide credit,&#8221; says Ray Goldberg,<br \/>\na professor at Harvard Business School. &#8220;Now someone else will.&#8221; The<br \/>\nsame argument, it will not have gone unnoticed, applies to Fannie and<br \/>\nFreddie.<br \/>\nFounded in 1916 as the first of the GSEs, the farm-credit system is now<br \/>\nover-regulated and fragmented. It encompasses about 100 different<br \/>\nfinancial institutions with $95 billion in assets. Farm Credit Services<br \/>\nis one of the largest, with almost $8 billion in assets drawn from just<br \/>\nfour states: Nebraska, South Dakota, Iowa and Wyoming. It initiated the<br \/>\nsale to Rabobank, and will pay heavily to ensure it goes through. It<br \/>\ncurrently has a net worth of $1.3 billion, and will pay a fee of $800m<br \/>\nto leave the overall farm-credit system. Rabobank will then pay $600m,<br \/>\nor a bit more than the remaining book value, with the proceeds<br \/>\ndistributed to the shareholders of Farm Credit Services, who comprise<br \/>\nmost of its customers.<br \/>\nIt is easy to see the deal&#8217;s logic for each side. The odd four-state<br \/>\nlimitation for operations means that Farm Credit Services has<br \/>\nincreasingly run into problems servicing customers whose operations<br \/>\nhave expanded into adjacent states or even internationally. By law,<br \/>\nmoreover, Farm Credit Services is unable to take deposits. If its<br \/>\nacquisition goes ahead, these and other restrictions would be lifted.<br \/>\nFor Rabobank, the acquisition is a small piece of a larger plan. Since<br \/>\n2002 it has purchased a bank in California, covering the farming areas<br \/>\nfrom Fresno to the Mexican border; an agricultural-land finance company<br \/>\nin St. Louis; and an Iowa-based farm-credit institution. And Rabobank<br \/>\nwould like to make further acquisitions that would give it better<br \/>\naccess to meat processors and breeders in the south, as well as tomato-<br \/>\nand citrus-growers in the southeast. It has an agreement with<br \/>\ngovernment-controlled banks in western Canada that could lead to an<br \/>\nacquisition there, and has become a huge force in the<br \/>\nagricultural-banking markets of Australia, New Zealand and Ireland. It<br \/>\nplans to expand in emerging economies, too.<br \/>\nSuch enthusiasm is less odd than it looks. True, agriculture is<br \/>\nnotoriously cyclical and has been shrinking as a percentage of the<br \/>\nglobal economy for years&#8211;not very attractive features for lenders. But<br \/>\na powerful niche player could overcome these obstacles. And it can sell<br \/>\nderivatives to farmers attempting to hedge weather and price<br \/>\nfluctuations. Rik van Slingelandt, head of Rabobank&#8217;s international<br \/>\noperations, says that, with the farming industry consolidating<br \/>\nglobally, farmers will want a global financial institution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Years (decades!) ago, I worked briefly for a bank. I recall that ag lending was, at the time, at best a poor stepchild to commercial lending. This Economist article provides a fascinating look at Rabobank&#8217;s (Dutch Bank) acquisition of Farm Credit Services &#8211; a US Government sponsored lending entity. Perhaps some Wisconsin Financiers should think [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/523"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=523"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/523\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=523"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=523"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=523"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}