{"id":10771,"date":"2022-10-09T01:05:00","date_gmt":"2022-10-09T07:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/?p=10771"},"modified":"2022-10-16T07:02:59","modified_gmt":"2022-10-16T13:02:59","slug":"10-9","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.zmetro.com\/?p=10771","title":{"rendered":"10.9"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

This must be a joke. Please tell me this is a joke. @nih<\/a> just gave @EcoHealthNYC<\/a> and Peter Daszak a NEW grant for bat coronavirus research?<\/p>\n

Including supplying \u201cviral sequences and isolates for use in vaccine development\u201d?<\/p>\n

Nope. Not a joke.<\/p>\n

The joke, apparently, is on us. pic.twitter.com\/b4p2fORn0u<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) October 2, 2022<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

However<\/a><\/span>, it is not the first time Biden has<\/span> <\/span><\/span>taken pages<\/a><\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/span>out of the Trump playbook. On immigration and the pandemic, he has maintained Trump-era policies for some time<\/span><\/p>\n

Lindt’s legal team also noticed how much Lidl’s<\/span> <\/span><\/span>rabbits<\/a><\/u> <\/span><\/span>looked like theirs, and it has argued in court that it <\/span>deserved<\/a><\/span> copyright protection against Lidl’s lookalikes. Last year, Lindt lost its case in Swiss commercial court, but earlier this week, the federal court in Lausanne ruled in Lindt’s favor.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Ah Huawei …. https:\/\/t.co\/KmtqnMhK1Y<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Steve Conlon (@stevenconlon) October 3, 2022<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

It\u2019s easy to embrace <\/span>ambitious green regulations when you pretend there\u2019s no cost<\/a><\/span>. But when Americans are paying more for energy, and especially so in California because of green mandates, those costs are now hitting home. It won\u2019t get better as long as states outsource environmental rule-making to politicians in Sacramento who will long ago have left office when the EV-car mandate strikes.<\/span><\/p>\n

Surveys are an essential approach for eliciting otherwise invisible factors<\/a><\/span> such as perceptions, knowledge and beliefs, attitudes, and reasoning. These factors are critical determinants of social, economic, and political outcomes. Surveys are not merely a research tool. They are also not only a way of collecting data. Instead, they involve creating the process that will generate the data. This allows the researcher to create their own identifying and controlled variation. Thanks to the rise of mobile technologies and platforms, surveys offer valuable opportunities to study either broadly representative samples or focus on specific groups. This paper offers guidance on the complete survey process, from the design of the questions and experiments to the recruitment of respondents and the collection of data to the analysis of survey responses. It covers issues related to the sampling process, selection and attrition, attention and carelessness, survey question design and measurement, response biases, and survey experiments.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Another astonishing clip from the Cato Institute event today, this one from the influential Adam Posen, head of the Peterson Institute. He says a focus on domestic manufacturing is simply a \u201cfetish for keeping white males with low education in the powerful positions they are in.\u201d pic.twitter.com\/ii4F0ssAjY<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Matt Stoller (@matthewstoller) October 6, 2022<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

New machine<\/a> pushes company toward goal of $100 genome sequence<\/p>\n

The fact that Mr Musk can, in a single week, get into a Twitter spat with the president of Ukraine<\/a>, in an online discussion forum that he has just agreed to buy, while also sending people into orbit, demonstrates the extent to which his growing technological superpowers have granted him geopolitical clout. Should that be cause for admiration or concern?<\/p>\n

\u201cThis plan as <\/span>announced<\/a><\/span> in practice means that, in certain areas, farmers have to reduce their nitrogen emissions by 70%,\u201d he continued. \u201cThat means they simply have to quit.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

UW Health says a \u201csignificant\u201d <\/span>donation<\/a><\/span> from Epic Systems will help it address a shortage of healthcare workers. (Electronic medical records are <\/span>heavily subsidized<\/a><\/span> by taxpayers).<\/p>\n

This quote is a strong <\/span>condemnation<\/a><\/span> of zoning. Does Gray, a scholar affiliated with the Mercatus Center, successfully make his case? He does. I confess that I was somewhat convinced of this before cracking the book. Decades ago, I read a 77?page article by legal scholar Bernard Siegan who made the case that Houston, the one major city in America that has avoided zoning, was doing well. Gray is quite familiar with Houston and, indeed, devotes a whole chapter to laying out in what ways it does well.<\/span><\/p>\n

The <\/span>National Security Archives<\/a><\/span> recently published a <\/span>declassified list<\/a><\/u> <\/span><\/span>of U.S. nuclear targets from 1956, which spanned 1,100 locations across Eastern Europe, Russia, China, and North Korea. The map below shows all 1,100 nuclear targets from that list, and we\u2019ve partnered with NukeMap to demonstrate how catastrophic a nuclear exchange between the United States and Russia could be. If you click detonate from any of the dots, you can see how large an area would be destroyed by the bomb of your choice, as well as how many people could be killed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Extending BMV to grade 3b would ban solar from about 41% of the land area of England, or about 58% of agricultural land. Much of grade 4 and 5 land is in upland areas that are unsuitable for solar developments.<\/p>\n

During her speech at the Conservative party conference last week, the prime minister, <\/span>Liz Truss<\/a>, reeled off a list of \u201cenemies\u201d, including green campaigners, who make up what she characterised as the \u201canti-growth coalition\u201d. However, green campaigners say blocking the building of renewables<\/a> would make her government part of such a group.<\/p>\n

\n

Anonymous DoD official upset that someone built something useful of their own volition. “Look, if it were fifteen years late, and twenty times the original estimate, we’d be thrilled to pay for it.” https:\/\/t.co\/y84mNT90jJ<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Ashlee Vance (@ashleevance) October 15, 2022<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n