Daily Archives: February 16, 2006

GM Deathwatch: 07 Tahoe Sales

Posted on by

Robert Farago:

This is a tale of two Tahoes. The first is a wildly successful SUV that’s flying off the lots at full price: a Hail Mary pass that will put General Motors back in the end zone, saving them from the unthinkable humiliation of bankruptcy, with only moments to spare. The second is a gas-guzzling truck that’s being swept out to sea by the vast receding tide of SUV buyers: a four-wheeled indictment of GM’s inability to build what America wants to drive at a price that makes the company enough money to stay in business. For the time being, which vehicle you see depends entirely on which one you want to see.

The Chevy Tahoe is built in Janesville.

Blodget on Amazon’s Music Strategy

Posted on by

Henry Blodget:

The WSJ reported Amazon’s plans to offer an Amazon-branded iPod competitor and digital music download store. I haven’t done much work in this area yet, so please weigh in, but this strikes me as a startlingly bad move.

First, Amazon’s entry into this business is shockingly and annoyingly late. As with the Netflix DVD business, Amazon could have owned this category, but in the name of moving deliberately (or of trying to become all things to all people), it allowed other competitors to build a dominant market position. No matter what the company says, winning significant market share in digital music is going to be much harder now than it would have been three years ago.

Will: No Checks, Many Imbalances

Posted on by

George F. Will:

But, then, perhaps no future president will ask for such congressional involvement in the gravest decision government makes — going to war. Why would future presidents ask, if the present administration successfully asserts its current doctrine? It is that whenever the nation is at war, the other two branches of government have a radically diminished pertinence to governance, and the president determines what that pertinence shall be. This monarchical doctrine emerges from the administration’s stance that warrantless surveillance by the National Security Agency targeting American citizens on American soil is a legal exercise of the president’s inherent powers as commander in chief, even though it violates the clear language of the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which was written to regulate wartime surveillance.

RIAA: Ripping Your CD’s is Not Fair Use (!)

Posted on by

EFF:

It is no secret that the entertainment oligopolists are not happy about space-shifting and format-shifting. But surely ripping your own CDs to your own iPod passes muster, right? In fact, didn’t they admit as much in front of the Supreme Court during the MGM v. Grokster argument last year?

Apparently not.

As part of the on-going DMCA rule-making proceedings, the RIAA and other copyright industry associations submitted a filing that included this gem as part of their argument that space-shifting and format-shifting do not count as noninfringing uses, even when you are talking about making copies of your own CDs:

Some of our politicians have been serving Hollywood’s interests (to the detriment of ours) rather well, including Jim Sensenbrenner and John Conyers, among others.